Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Painting Checklist

Artist, Work 

Formal elements:
color
composition
texture
quality of brush strokes/application
lighting
size
subject matter
values/tonal variation
support/surface
space/perspective
viewing angle

Description will be about the use of these formal elements
Analyze how these formal elements affect the viewers understanding of the work
How does the artist use formal elements to give you initial emotional response

Thesis: How does the painting mean 
Imagine describing in a succinct way: dimensions, subject, arrangement à enable someone who can’t see it to see in the minds eye in 1st paragraph
Detail formal elements, figure out how they mean, conclude

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Class 2 Lesson


§  Terms
   Contrapposto: an asymmetrical arrangement of the human figure in which the line of the arms and shoulders contrasts with while balancing those of the hips and legs.
   Frieze: a broad horizontal band of sculpted or painted decoration, esp. on a wall near the ceiling. Architecture: the part of an entablature between the architrave and the cornice.
   Kore: an archaic Greek statue of a young woman, standing and clothed in long loose robes.
   Kouros: an archaic Greek statue of a young man, standing and often naked.
   Metope: a square space between triglyphs in a Doric frieze.
   Pediment: the triangular upper part of the front of a building in classical style, typically surmounting a portico of columns.
   Polychromy: the art of painting in several colors, esp. as applied to ancient pottery, sculpture, and architecture.
   Relief: a method of molding, carving, or stamping in which the design stands out from the surface, to a greater ( high relief) or lesser ( bas-relief) extent.
   Stylization: depict or treat in a mannered and nonrealistic

Archaic, Early Classical and Classical Greek Sculpture
§  Greek Archaic Period: 6th Century BC
   New York Kouros, c. 590 BC, marble, 6’ 4”, New York, Metropolitan Museum
   Kroisos, c. 530 BC, marble, 6’ 4”, Athens, National Museum
§  Early Classic Period: First Half, 5th Century BC
   Kritios Boy, c. 480 BC, marble, 34”, Athens, Acropolis Museum
§  Greek Classical Period: Second Half, 5th Century BC
   Polykleitos, Doryphoros (Spear Bearer)
¬       original bronze, c. 450 – 440 BC (lost)
¬       Roman copy, marble, 6’ 5”, Naples, Archaeological Museum

Sculpture of the Parthenon
§  Greek Classical Period: Second Half, 5th Century BC
   Phidias and other sculptors: 438 – 432 BC
¬       metopes, battle scenes, 4’ 4”, marble
®     east: Gods and Giants
®     west: Grees and Amazons
®     north: Sack of Troy
®     south: Lapiths and Centaurs
¬       frieze, Panathenaic Procession, 3’ 7”, marble (one section in Paris, Louvre)
¬       West Pediment, Founding of Athens, marble
¬       East Pediment, Birth of Athena, marble, London, British Museum
¬       Interior: Phidias, Athena Parthenos, gold and ivory, colossal (destroyed)
   The Greek building is conceived as a three-dimensional entity complete on all sides and perfect unto itself. Moreover, care is normally taken so that the viewer perceives it as such. Thus, Greek buildings are not presented frontally, that is, on axis. Rather, whenever possible, the building is first presented from the diagonal, or at least from a position off-center, so that two adjacent sides are seen establishing clearly the three-dimensional integrity of the structure.
   The Parthenon centerpieces the birth of Athena and her struggle with Poseidon, portrayed in the pediments; the metopes depicted legendary battles and the fall of Troy; and around the cella walls was a frieze which represented the annual Panathenaic procession, which wound its way from the city up to the Parthenon.
   The Parthenon is unique in many ways, some obvious, some scarcely visible. Its design was strongly affected by Phidias’s gold-and-ivory cult image of Athena. For this 40-foot colossus, an immense cella was needed, over 60 feet in width, with a central aisle some 35 feet wide. The plan of the double-tiered dividing colonnades was an innovation: instead of merely running directly to the rear wall as was customary, the two colonnades are carried around the end of the naos, behind the statue along a U-shaped path, drawing the framing structure around the goddess.
   The design of the Parthenon resulted in almost paradoxical architectural effects. The colonnade is dense and corporeal, yet its columns soar in their slenderness. The huge entablature is monumental, yet carried so effortlessly that is seems almost to float. These effects are due, again, to the building’s unique proportions: the columns are more slender than any earlier example and, correspondingly, the entablature is unusually narrow, hence visually light.
   The entire temple floor rises gently toward the center in the subtlest of domical shapes. Further, nearly all the vertical elements, including the columns, lean inward. The inner faces of the cella walls are vertical, but the outer surface taper inward and the entrance doors to the cella are curved. Finally, the channels of the column flutes deepen gradually toward the top.
 
  Summary of the time period:  What we accomplish in the Greek architectural periods is the beginning of the importance of the orders and the beginning of conceptualization about the perfection of architecture.  This fuels the classical language- this fuels Roman architecture… these time periods fuel everything.  The orders, in their Grecian form, are considered by some to be coarser and cruder than the Roman forms, but by others they are considered to be purer because they are the beginning, nearer to the source of pure architecture.  Whether you favor one opinion or the other, what we do experience visually in Greek architecture are columns that are more massive and squatter than the Roman form of that order.

Greek Sculpture: 4th Century through Hellenistic
§  Greek 4th Century Period: 4th Century BC
   Praxiteles, Hermes, c. 330 – 320 BC, Roman copy, marble, c. 7’, Olympia, Museum
   ____, Aphrodite of Knidos, 350 – 340 BC, Roman copy, marble, 2.04 m, Vatican Museums
§  Hellenistic Period: 3rd – 1st Centuries BC
   Barberini Faun, c. 220 BC, marble, 7’ 5/8”, Munich, Glyptothek
   Nike of Samothrace, 200 – 190 BC, marble, 8’, Paris, Louvre

Early Byzantine Period: 5th – 6th Centuries A.D.
§  Hagia Sophia, Istanbul
   Its true greatness comes from the combination of the central unit with the complex figuration of forms that lie between it and the perimeter wall, the most important and adventurous of which are to the east and west. Here, twin half-domes billow out from beneath the high arches of the dome, doubling the extent of the central “nave.” Each half-dome rests on three arches supported by the main piers and two smaller piers at the outer edge of the building. Within the outer two of the three arches, in turn, small half-domed apses swing out, internally supported by two levels of arcading. To the east, a short barrel-vaulted forechoir opens to the brilliantly lit main apse; the corresponding bay to the west is occupied by the barrel vault over the main entrance. Thus the nave comprises three levels of vaulting: the dome, the two main half-domes, and the four smaller half-domes.
   The building does not develop uniformly in all directions, but only with bilateral symmetry. Therefore, even though it has an immense domed core, it also possesses a strong longitudinal axis, a central nave that dominates the interior within a peripheral zone of aisles and galleries that are screened off from the nave by the double levels of arcades mentioned above.

Romanesque, 11th – 12th Centuries
§  Sainte Foy, Conques
   French buildings of local stone, very monochromatic
   Round arches and pediments, but dramatically stretched out
   Strong sense of plane
   French buildings have twin towers
   Nave flanked by aisles, large transept causing crossing, aisles flanking transept, altar always in east end, elaborate east end with ambulatory which allowed pilgrims to walk down aisle and around transepts during service, beyond ambulatory are radiating chapels creating the chevets, extremely narrow in relation to height (medieval verticality), undecorated interior, barrel vault over nave, half barrel vaults over aisles to buttress
§  Church of the Magdalen, Vezelay
   Vezelay is particularly known for its sculpture and interior. The Classical detailing is similar to Cluny or Autun, more striking would be the simplification of the nave elevation. Between the nave arcade and the clerestory runs not an elaborate zone, but a broad expanse of plain masonry divided by a single classicizing cornice. As if to compensate for this plainness, Vezelay introduces red-and-white banded arches and it is covered not by a severe barrel vault but by a series of large cross vaults
   Each bay has round vault, piers are more complicated: cross-shaped core and 4 columns attached, two-story elevation in nave, clerestory windows, no barrel vault over nave, colorful Roman style, at crossing, architectural style changes, Romanesque nave at crossing, colonnettes appear (no vaults), church shifts to Gothic: pointed arches, rib vaults, colonnettes, etc.
   Christ in central portal in narthex
¬       Book of Ecclesiastes: Church constructed out of faithful, prophets, apostles, followers, Christ himself is the keystone
¬       Center portal in middle suggest figures above columns are figures who precede Christ and apostles, resting on side and central piece is a lintel with peoples of world summoned to Christianity, in center is St. Peter (first pope), ie: Church literally brings you to Christ
¬       3 archivolt
¬       Outside are decorations
¬       Center archivolt is zodiac and the eternal revolution of time, 12 labors of each month
¬       Peoples of world, must have some deformity
¬       At top is Christ, breaking inner ring of archivolt
¬       Christ enthroned, shown in halo-like form, oval shape, halo with cross, arms extended similar to crucifixion
¬       Throne to heaven, crucifixion brings salvation
¬       Scale is a measure of importance à Christ is largest
¬       Apostles closest to Christ have more windblown garments, rays streaming from figures
¬       Lintel frieze on central portal in narthex
®     Lintel: two processions coming to cneter, representing people of the world, to whom Christ’s word is spread
®     People with large ears need ears to hear the word of God
®     African pygmy climbing ladder to get on horse
®     Racist view of the rest of the world

Early Gothic: Mid-Late 12th Century
§  Laon
   Cruciform plan, very wide and spacious, tall and filled with light
   Desire to build larger and brighter buildings leads to Gothic architecture
   technological innovation of rib vault, supports webbing and is light, no need for massive supports à thin verticals and room for clerestory windows
   Bundles of colonnettes and shafts rise to support transverse arches, ribs, alternating between number of shafts/colonnettes
   nave: 4 stories, capped by series of 6 part vaults, stabilized by buttress under roof and flying buttress
   Ground level columns/piers, pointed arches, verticality, 2nd level gallery is wide, 3rd level has slender colonnettes holding arches, triforium (dark area), windows in galleries and aisles but not triforium, 4th level clerestory

High Gothic: Late 12th Century – Early 13th Century
§  Chartres Cathedral
   The simplified vault reads with immediate clarity and caps a strikingly narrowed, soaring spatial unit
   The piers that frame the new bays are, correspondingly, no longer of alternating, disparate form, but uniformly tall and strong.
   Eliminating the gallery and maintaining the relative scale of the triforium allowed for the expansion of arcade and clerestory, particularly the latter, which along with the triforium, could be lowered into the gallery zone. The rigorous Chartres Master elected to increase arcade and clerestory equally and to fill the added clerestory area with a new subdivided window form, called tracery, in the shape of twin lancets surmounted by an oculus. This pattern was to be the basic tracery format throughout the Gothic period.
   The soaring proportions of the bay units reinforce the vertical drive of the piers, which is further accentuated by the upward thrust of arcade and window outlines. The vertical lines of energy are cut by strong horizontals, particularly by the strong, dark belt of the triforium that sweeps the interior exactly at midheight.
   The flying buttresses, if sufficiently developed, made the gallery redundant as lateral bracing. It is the powerful system of flying buttresses at Chartres that allows the skeletal nave walls to soar high and free. On the interior these buttresses are completely hidden, but on the outside they form a massing of great bulk. Tremendous exterior piers absorb the ponderous thrust channeled down from the vaults through three tiers of flying quadrant arches.
   Center Portal West, tympanum and lintel
¬       Top is Virgin and Christ
¬       Archivolts represent 7 liberal arts
¬       Center portal: frontal, columnar appearance of figures, no depth, but of building
¬       Church built out of various components
¬       Unification between sculpture and architecture
¬       Compare Chartres with Vezelay
¬       Figures are columnar, lend support
¬       Christ in Vezelay is flat, at Chartres, legs project out in 3-D sense, corporal nature of Christ and human figures
¬       Chartres Christ, halo with cross, flanked by 4 evangelists, surrounded by figures in archivolts, supported by apostles, quieter drapery, no expression in face à idealized calm

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Sculpture Paper

One page paper describing work of sculpture using checklist

  • Artist, Date, Location (general)
  • Size (dimensions)
  • Material
  • Physical description
    • Form
    • Texture
  • Meaning (your analysis/interpretation based solely on your personal visual experience)

***

As an example, my outline and paper for a similar assignment:
(Note: my paper was 2 pages your papers will be only 1 page long)

Antoine Louis Barye
“Horse attacked by Lion”
ca.1835
Bronze

Physical Description
Bronze figure
App. 12 inches tall
Horse rearing back, icon across back
Standing horses back two legs/feet on roots (?) and stomach on rock or tree trunk
Ground is bumpy and there is a lot of texture to the surface, not smooth like animals

Horse
Back right leg is on ground at midpoint, looks like he was rearing up when attacked and is bracing himself, back left leg is against a branch
Big, strong leg muscles, some definition indicates size, but its not as much definition as exists in reality
Tail is large, detail in hairs on tail
More attention given to details of legs then back, stomach of horse
Front left leg kicking out, drawing front right leg in, see the bones at the joints
Neck is simple but there is some emphasis on the musculature of the neck
Mouth open wide and face shows pain, eyes wide and looking up as if in anguish, ears laid back on head

Lion
Biting the left side of the horses’ back
Detailed mane
Spine showing through skin
Front legs gripping the top of the horses back, back legs swung up on horses right shoulder and front right side, claws digging into flesh, you can see tears in the horse flesh from the back right leg on the neck, across back for from front left
Muscles suggested and strong but not distinctly defined, present especially in back legs, front legs
Detailed paws and face and mane, nose and mouth wrinkled around bite
Meant to be viewed in the round, detail in all sides and angles

Outline
1. Introduction, Thesis: curves, expression of animals depicts a scene of attack, pain, aggression, 
2. Description of piece: sculpture, bronze, two animals, bumpy ground, smooth animals
3. Description of horse as main subject from viewpoint
4. Description of lion as secondary subject, causing a reaction in the horse, reaction is the focus
5. Name as indication that horse is focal point vs. lion (horse attacked by lion, order indicates importance)
6. Conclusion: ? (do not restate thesis)

***

Sculptural Analysis
Antoine Barye’s Horse attacked by Lion is a bronze sculpture, a little over a foot in height, of a horse rearing with a lion clinging to the horse’s back. The Williams College Museum of Art presents the sculpture so that the horse is the primary subject of the sculpture. The sculpture is encased in glass against a wall, so that the details of the lion’s face and neck are visible only after peering around the back of the display. By orienting the sculpture this way, the horse and its reaction to the attack are the prominent actions in the piece, limiting the lion’s importance by depicting in limited detail its body slung over the horse’s back and hind legs digging into the horse’s flesh. The orientation, choice of detail and material, surface texture, and reflection of light in this sculpture combine to create a snapshot of tumultuous motion between the horse and lion.

The WCMA’s choice of exhibition greatly affects the interpretation of the piece. The current display introduces the sculpture with the horse’s face and kicking forelegs, setting the subsequent approach and viewing in the reference frame of the horse’s pain. A 180° rotation of the sculpture, however, changes the focus to the lion, sinking his teeth into the horse’s back. In this perspective, the horse’s head is turned away from the viewer and the expression of agony is less apparent, giving it less emphasis. Instead, the strength and ferocity of the lion attracts more attention, its powerful neck engaged and paws gripping the back. Introducing the sculpture by this angle would depict a victorious attack of a lion, a celebration, instead of the agonizing defeat of a horse. The title of the piece does not definitively distinguish which is the proper view; Horse attacked by Lion supports both: the horse the main focal point due to its placement at the beginning of the title and the subject acted upon, or the lion by its dominant role in the action.

The base of the sculpture is part of the action, an indiscriminately bumpy and textured surface, contrasting with the overall smoothness and shine of the two animals. Both the horse’s front legs and tail extend beyond the frame of the base, indicating the horse’s struggle to break free of this instant. The horse’s hind legs are pressed against tree roots, which mimic the shape of the horse’s legs and hooves. A tree trunk rests against the horse’s abdomen, but does not yet seem to cause the horse pressure or pain. Most of the horse is smooth, downplaying realistic details except for the front shoulders, neck, and face. The bronze gives the horse a sleek and soft look, and the light plays off the shoulders and flank, giving the horse the impression of sweat glistening on his coat. The proportional size of the horse contributes to the perception that it is a strong animal, by not emphasizing the stress of the attack in all the muscles of the body, the fight of the front legs kicking up and the contortion of the face and neck enhances the tormented agony the horse experiences in this moment. A wild-eyed gaze, open mouth, and tensed facial muscles straining upwards produce the strongest depiction of the horse’s pain and trauma. 

The frontal viewing of the WCMA display of the sculpture depicts the lion as little more than an indiscriminate backside and legs. Barye shows little detail of the hindquarters of the lion, a few backbones of the spine show through the skin and the contour line along the back create the motion of the lion fighting to stay on the horse’s back and pushing up off his back legs to increase the power of his attack. One of the few details expressing the lion’s direct affect on the horse from the front view are the tears from the lion’s claws across the horse’s front right shoulder. Peering around the back, however, the lion comes to life: the hairs and shape of the mane are defined; the wrinkles and features in the face portray the depth of the bite and the aggression of and fixation on a successful attack. 

Syllabus

Our course syllabus:



Month
Date

Topic

Assignments

October

8
Introduction to Art History
Pick favorite art works and write short paragraph
October
15
Sculptural Analysis
One page paper describing a work of sculpture using given checklist
October
22
Greek/Roman Art vs. Christian Art
(Sculpture and Architecture)
Research Bulgarian religious art, write paragraph description

October

29
Italian Art 15th – 16th centuries

Select work of Italian art, research context, write paragraph
November
5
18th – 20th century sculpture
Write one page paper describing a sculpture
November
12
19h century painting
Write one page paper describing a painting using checklist
November
19
Early 20th century painting
Write one page paper describing  a painting

December

3
Propaganda
(primarily World War II)
Write one page paper analyzing piece of propaganda
December
10
20th century American painting
Write one page paper analyzing a modern painting;
Select work for longer paper
December
17
“How the work Means”

Write two page paper
January
14
Popular imagery – magazines, movies, musicians, etc
Write reflection on course, experience, new knowledge, perspective on art